Commentary

To the Writers of HIMYM

Dear sirs and madams:

My name is Kevin Whipps, and I’m a writer from Scottsdale, Arizona. I’ve been watching How I Met Your Mother (HIMYM) since the beginning, and up until recently, it’s really been quite enjoyable to tune into every Monday night. Recently though, not so much. And it needs to change, or else I’m going to stop watching — and I don’t think I’m the only one thinking that.

Remember Lost? Of course you do, we all watched Lost in the beginning, and some even hung onto the end. Those that did had lots of still unanswered questions left in the lurch, as did viewers of Battlestar Galactica. This creates a frustration with the viewers because we sit there, watching, patiently waiting for the show to put down a question, then answer said question within a reasonable amount of time. The amount varies based on the show, but I can say now with confidence that seven seasons is way too long to know how Ted actually meets the mother of his children.

It’s not that we don’t enjoy the hijinks of Barney, Ted and the gang, but since the title isn’t How Five Friends Spend Time at a Bar we want the story to progress. We want clues dropped then responded to. We want closure, and there’s no reason you can’t give it to us and still give us another five years of quality programming.

Emotionally, we, the viewers, are spent. First we’re getting involved with Ted and his fantastically horrid love life, but now Barney has gone from being the lovable bachelor to a lovelorn puppy who is pining away for Robin — the same person, by the way, who’s supposed to marry a brunette newscaster as per the guideline set a few seasons back. As for Marshall and Lilly, well they’re married and expecting their first child, but because they live out in Long Island now, their involvement in the bar scene is becoming a bit of a stretch. Sure, at least Marshall is in the city every day for work, but is Lilly really making that commute to work at a school when she could do the same thing closer by? Doesn’t seem logical.

Mathematically, you’ve got a problem, too. The conversation with Ted’s children takes place in 2030, at least per the show, and those children are at least 14 years old, give or take. Assuming that’s the case, then one of them was born in 2016, so you’ve got four years at the most to make this thing happen. But in a reasonable world, Ted’s going to want to meet the girl, hang out for a bit and then have children. Does all that happen in a year? Maybe, but Ted’s not getting any younger, so this has to happen sometime soon.

These premises are just becoming such stretches that we’re losing interest. And when you dropped the “love” bullshit between Ted and Robin last episode, I turned off the TV and seriously considered pulling the show from my DVR. Against my better judgement, I watch again this week and at the end Marshall won’t let Lilly concede to the bet, saying “Not yet” in reference to Ted and Robin never working out. You could almost see the disdain on Jason Segel’s face as he spit out the lines, like even he thought it was a stupid idea to keep dragging this thing out. Stop it. Just, stop it.

So how do you fix it? Easy. Give us the girl.

Now we know she has a yellow umbrella, but at this point it’s been years since she lost the thing, so who knows if she cares that it’s missing. And we also know she was Rachel Bilson’s roommate, but that was so long ago that it’s not even a relevant clue. However you do it, we now need to meet her. Let’s make the connection and move the story forward, or else Ted is going to be 65 and looking for chicks at AARP meetings.

Once they do meet though, the story isn’t over. Now we know how he met the mother, but the story can transition. They can break up, get back together, fight, argue, get married — you know, the stuff that couples do. You’ve easily got another year’s worth of stories before the marriage, and for the end of season 8 or 9, that’s where you go. Or maybe to the birth of the kids. Whatever it is, you can draw this out. It works.

But right now, you’re just playing this game where you’re giving us enough to be able to wrap up the show quickly if it gets cancelled, but also not enough to really make any reasonable progress to move the story along. It’s like a seven year long game of “just the tip” — we want more, we’ve been patient, we’ve put in the work. Let us finish, for fuck’s sake.

I’ve been debating if this show has already jumped the shark, but if it hasn’t yet, it seems imminent. Before you go off riding Fonzie’s coattails into television history, consider rewarding those of us that have been watching since the beginning. We want our payoff. I know that if I don’t get it soon, I’m just going to bail on it faster than I did on Lost.

Smoke and Mirrors

I’ve worked at quite a few different places over the years, and at times there seems to be a sense that I’m spending time at a magic show. There’s always some kind of trickery being pulled one way or another, and it’s all an illusion — just pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

The biggest example of this was my time at 944, a place made up of some very bright people, but it was all smoke and mirrors. I tell this story all the time, but it bears repeating.

When you walked into the front office of 944′s HQ in Scottsdale, it was hard not to be impressed. Smack dab in front was a water feature with a 944 topiary, which just screamed “we have money.” There was always a pretty (if not beautiful) receptionist up front, positioned behind a zebrawood desk and modern furniture that was so modern that it was uncomfortable to sit in. Oh, and the 944 cover with Paris Hilton was there as well, just in case you had any doubts of who they were and how important the magazine was. For sure, people were impressed when they walked in the door — I know I was.

But 944 was really just like that fancy water feature. At first glance, it really looked cool — lots of detail, fancy rocks and modern zebrawood surrounding the base — but if you took a closer look, it was all just a façade. The zebrawood was really a laminate, and if you peered around the left side of the base all of it was peeling off. The water feature rarely worked, often leaving hard water stains on the glass that were almost impossible to remove. And it leaked too (right onto a power outlet, I might add), making it dangerous to work in the area, or even just walk by. Oh, and the topiary wasn’t made of real bushes, although I suppose that wouldn’t make much sense since there was no light to keep them alive. Regardless, the water feature was a joke amongst us in the office, and later, among those who were cast off like so much discarded trash when the house of cards all fell apart.

Although I’m fortunate enough not to be in a situation that’s full of smoke and mirrors today, I will say that I come across these people all the time. They always want to baffle me with their bullshit, and sometimes I just want to believe them. But every time I do, I think back to that water feature and just take an extra moment to take in my surroundings and see if they’re really full of shit. Usually when I do that, I can see the curtain, and behind it is a little man working levers furiously.

The Bryce Conundrum

A few years back, my buddy Chad and I were doing some side work on another friend of ours’ trucks, installing an airbag kit and laying the truck out on 20-inch wheels. The thing was coming out pretty cool, but we hit a snag towards the end of the project, something that we hadn’t anticipated.

Bryce, the owner of the truck, wanted three things out of the project: He wanted to keep the stock bed floor, he wanted to lay the frame on the ground and keep his mammoth rear tires. Problem was, he could only have two out of those three things. If he wanted to keep the tires and stock bed floor, he wouldn’t lay on the frame. If he wanted to lay on the frame, he could keep the tires but not keep the stock bed floor. If he laid on the frame, he could keep the stock bed floor but he’d have to lose the tires. There just wasn’t a great compromise that stood out.

It doesn’t really matter if you understand any of the preceding paragraphs or not, because I get that it’s all technical jargon. However, the Bryce Conundrum is a fairly universal concept: You want three things, but only two of them can happen, and it doesn’t matter which two they are. I run into this problem all the time, and it doesn’t matter what business you’re in, or whether you’re a car guy or not. We can’t always have what we want, and sometimes we have to make a compromise.

The other day I ran into that situation with one of my clients, and I thought back to that day in the garage with Bryce and Chad, talking about the various options we had in front of us. In Bryce’s case, we ended up cutting the bed floor but keeping it as stock looking as possible, which became the best alternative for his situation. With the client though, we were stuck: there just was no easy compromise.

Unfortunately, it’s not always as easy as taking out a Sawzall and getting dirty. If only that was the case.

Business Model

Recently, I reviewed an amp named Stamped, which is a social network based around the concept of liking specific items and giving them a stamp accordingly. This app has made a wave across the Internet, mostly because it’s well designed and a new startup, like everything seems to be nowadays (not that I’m complaining). But with Stamped, one of the key complaints is that the company doesn’t have a business model. From Shawn Blanc under the “Cons” column:

NO BUSINESS MODEL, YET: Build a big and happy user base now, figure out how to sustain the business later. That seems to be the business model of choice for many new startups. It was Twitter’s business model, it is Instagram’s, and it is Stamped’s as well.

A few years back, right around the time that Square was starting up, I interviewed Jack Dorsey, the founder of both Square and Twitter, for a magazine I was freelancing for at the time. I remember researching the project, thinking a lot about how and why someone would start a service like Twitter, when there is no way to monetize it. It just didn’t make sense. So I asked him just that: How do you start a company with no idea how you’re going to make money? His response struck me as very profound, and I wish I could find it right now to quote him verbatim, but here’s a paraphrased version:

“You do what you love and then you find a way to make it work.”

Simple, right? That answer really made me think, particularly at that moment as I was just a few months into my new business, my son was not yet born and I was very scared about the future. Would I make it? Was it possible to make that kind of money? Could I support my family on this work?

What Dorsey said made sense to me, and I’ve held that in high regard for the past few years, just keeping it in the back of my mind on those days when the money doesn’t seem to be moving right and the writing seems to be up and down. I think about that and remind myself that I love what I do, and that’s the important part. I’ll find a way to make it work.

I don’t know anything about the guys at Stamped. Hell, I don’t even know if they’re guys, and all I do know is that they’re another startup with an iPhone app. Maybe they’re a bunch of hippies with a dream, or corporate robots with ideas of striking it rich in the App market, I don’t know. But is it my place — or anyone else’s — to question their business plan? To judge them based on an idea that they came up with?

Maybe what they’re just doing what they love. I’m sure they’ll figure out what to do next.

An Open Letter to Samsung

Dear Samsung:

First off, big fan. I currently own three Samsung TVs and a Samsung Fridge, and I just helped my parents buy a new Samsung LED TV too, and it’s super cool. Frankly, there aren’t too many companies out there that I trust for big purchases like that anymore, and you’re one of them. And up until recently, I was planning on buying a new Samsung TV for my office, a purely trivial purchase that I wanted to make just in time for baseball season. But now … well now I’m not so sure.

See, I trust Samsung products to work and work well, and that’s why I buy them. But I also trust Apple products, and I enjoy using them. In fact, I’m typing this post on an Apple MacBook Air connected to an Apple display, and I’ve got another Apple computer behind me. Frankly, the two big brands in this house are Apple and Samsung, which have worked in harmony pretty well so far.

But your latest commercial — the one for the Samsung Galaxy SII (video here) — well, it makes you guys look like a bunch of dicks.

I’m one of those guys who waits in line for new Apple products, and I do so for a few different reasons:

  1. They have a well-established infrastructure which I’m heavily invested in.
  2. The products are well designed.
  3. Each item speaks volumes about the quality and workmanship involved in putting them together.
  4. They’re easy to use.

With the exception of No. 1, I could use those terms to describe Samsung products as well. My LED TV isn’t the top of the line model, but it still puts out a gorgeous picture, was simple to mount, is designed well, easy to use and appears to be put together well. I feel like I’m holding a quality piece every time I touch the TV, and that’s why I paid more for it than the competition.

If I’m an Apple guy for most stuff, and a Samsung guy for the rest, how do you think it makes me feel to be called a sheep? To be told I’m a loser because I wait in line for the latest iPhone when the competition has something else out there?

It makes me feel like never buying another Samsung product again, that’s how it makes me feel.

Samsung and Apple consumers are the same people. We buy both because we want that kind of quality in our merchandise; the kind of stuff we’ll keep for years, or until a newer and better thing comes along. Why would you try to separate us like that? Why can’t we coexist in harmony?

When comparing statistics, I can see why you would think that your new smartphone is better than the iPhone, but it just isn’t. I’m not going to reinvest my cash into anything Android, because I can never trust where it’s going to end up. What App Store do I use? Amazon? Google? Some other one? I’m not that guy. And a bigger screen? Look, it’s more important to me that my phone fit in my pocket than being able to watch movies on a big screen the one or two times a month that I do so. Just going by stats isn’t going to help you here; you need to start from the ground up and make it awesome.

And if you did that, I would have considered switching sides to your product because it was better than what Apple has. But after I saw that commercial, I realized that you really don’t care about those of us who choose Samsung over the competition for our goods, we’re just Apple sheep. Sure, you’d kill to have your own following, but by calling the Apple people fanboys, you may have just cut off your nose to spite your face.

Guess the marketing department really hit that one out of the park, huh?

Sincerely,

-Kevin Whipps

P.S. Have you heard the rumors about how one of Steve Jobs’ last big “aha!” moments was the TV and how to make it work better? And how the rumor is that this new TV is coming out next year? If the rumors are true, I guarantee there will be a surge of Samsung TVs on sale at the same time — on Craigslist.

Speaking of Bullshit …

Here’s a hell of a Craigslist ad. Could I please work for less than 3 cents a word? PLEASE?

http://phoenix.craigslist.org/evl/wri/2695148995.html

Bullshitters

I few years back, I really got myself in some hot water, and it ended up leading me down a path that I’m not too proud of today. Long story short, I was a bullshitter. I talked my way out of many awkward, embarrassing or dangerous situations just by manipulating the conversation effectively. When I was busted on it, I feigned ignorance but eventually, the house of cards all came crumbling down, and I’m still recovering from that today.

Today, I feel it’s very important to tell the truth, and that I have to keep my moral standards higher than I used to just to keep up. I make lots of decisions based on that new code of mine, and sometimes it’s not always beneficial to my bottom line.

I know a few bullshitters right now, and it always amazes me to see how they work. I watch how their mind is twisting things around to try to save themselves, and I almost feel sorry for them and who they are. I know their pain, and I just hope they don’t end up in the same situation that I did, lost and confused without a friend in the world.

I bring this up because I’ve been asked quite a few times recently to break my moral code, and it’s been quite difficult to take a stand. In some cases, it affects my bottom line. In others, it affects my personal relationships. In both, it puts me in a bad position.

But if I were to go back to the person I was, then what kind of example would I be setting for my son?

It means that I might just have to bite the bullet sometime soon and walk away from the situation. It sucks really bad, but I never want to see the old Kevin again, and right now I can feel him peeking around the corner, waiting for me me to fail.

All content on this site copyright 2012 Kevin Whipps